<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New OpenID.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willnorris.com/2007/10/new-openidnet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willnorris.com/2007/10/new-openidnet</link>
	<description>managing identity</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheFire</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2007/10/new-openidnet#comment-13852</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/2007/10/new-openidnet#comment-13852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;sorry for the off-topic post. I'll post over under the appropriate section.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the off-topic post. I&#8217;ll post over under the appropriate section.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: openmaru studio</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2007/10/new-openidnet#comment-13640</link>
		<dc:creator>openmaru studio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/2007/10/new-openidnet#comment-13640</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Big kudos: OpenID.net relaunched!...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OpenID.net relaunched last night and should we call it "pure beauty"? It looks really nice! We know Open ID, in general, has needed something more "average-user-friendly" and what more could we want now with a site like this now? :) What amazed and...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Big kudos: OpenID.net relaunched!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>OpenID.net relaunched last night and should we call it &#8220;pure beauty&#8221;? It looks really nice! We know Open ID, in general, has needed something more &#8220;average-user-friendly&#8221; and what more could we want now with a site like this now? :) What amazed and&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
