<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Etiquette: Replying to Mailing Lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists</link>
	<description>there&#039;s more to life than this</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta3-20574</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deciphering Twitter @replies &#8212; Will Norris</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists#comment-31196</link>
		<dc:creator>Deciphering Twitter @replies &#8212; Will Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/?p=467#comment-31196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] actually doing, so I decided to try a quick experiment. Just like email replies (which I recently ranted about), there are two ways to designate a reply in Twitter. Akin to the subject of an email, you can [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] actually doing, so I decided to try a quick experiment. Just like email replies (which I recently ranted about), there are two ways to designate a reply in Twitter. Akin to the subject of an email, you can [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Norris</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists#comment-28854</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/?p=467#comment-28854</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@koes: I actually do have it installed, but not for commenting... only for new account registration.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@koes: I actually do have it installed, but not for commenting&#8230; only for new account registration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koes</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists#comment-28803</link>
		<dc:creator>koes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/?p=467#comment-28803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;where&#039;s the vidoop captcha plugin?  :-D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where&#8217;s the vidoop captcha plugin?  :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad La Joie</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists#comment-28306</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad La Joie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/?p=467#comment-28306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ahmen brother!  Guess what I&#039;ll be linking to the next time some one on the Shib list does this.  ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmen brother!  Guess what I&#8217;ll be linking to the next time some one on the Shib list does this.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Paul Weber</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists#comment-27837</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Paul Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/?p=467#comment-27837</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is indeed annoying.  In line with those who do this, are those who just dump their &quot;reply&quot; at the top of a message and leave &lt;em&gt;the whole thread&lt;/em&gt; in reverse order, at the bottom.  The amount of time I spend scrolling down to find what they&#039;re replying to, guessing at it half the time, then coming back up, is atrocious.  If people would just put their reply content right after the sections they reply to (aka intermixing) it would save me at least an hour each day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;sigh&lt;/em&gt; too much bad netiquette these days.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed annoying.  In line with those who do this, are those who just dump their &#8220;reply&#8221; at the top of a message and leave <em>the whole thread</em> in reverse order, at the bottom.  The amount of time I spend scrolling down to find what they&#8217;re replying to, guessing at it half the time, then coming back up, is atrocious.  If people would just put their reply content right after the sections they reply to (aka intermixing) it would save me at least an hour each day.</p>

<p><em>sigh</em> too much bad netiquette these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://willnorris.com/2008/12/email-etiquette-replying-to-mailing-lists#comment-27771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willnorris.com/?p=467#comment-27771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ahh... it&#039;s actually a huge relief knowing I&#039;m not the only cranky person today.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quite right Will!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Merry Christmas to you, too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh&#8230; it&#8217;s actually a huge relief knowing I&#8217;m not the only cranky person today.</p>

<p>Quite right Will!</p>

<p>Merry Christmas to you, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

