I still remember when I made the conscious decision to go by the name “Will” instead of “William”. I was 11 or 12 years old, and we were moving from Irving, Texas, where we had lived the last 7 years or so, to Olive Branch, Mississippi.
I don’t honestly recall why I decided to go by a different name. Name changes are common throughout history to mark a new beginning in one’s life. In the Bible, Abram is given the name Abraham, Jacob is renamed Israel, and Saul of Tarsus becomes Paul the Apostle. Converts to Islam will often take on a new Islamic name, and it is common for monarchs and newly elected popes to take a regnal name when they inherit the throne. It is customary in many cultures to take the surname of a spouse, or a blending of the two surnames, when one is married. Perhaps at some level I wanted to mark this new beginning in my life. I was leaving behind everyone I knew, and would be starting fresh with school, with friends… with everything. Maybe I wanted a new name to represent this new part of my life. Or perhaps I was simply emulating my older brother Steven, who at the time had chosen to go by “Steve”.
My immediate family was pretty good about respecting my decision. My mom later told me that when they were picking names for my brother and me, they went through all the possible nicknames and made sure they would be okay with them. Occasionally my mom would slip and call me William, and I remember that I used to get really mad about that. I don’t think my grandparents ever stopped calling me William, but after a while I got over it.
I think that I really started giving thought to my online identity when I was in college at Georgia Tech. When I was a
student, we were all given a “GT Number”, which was simply an opaque username and email address. Mine was gte739u,
and so my email address was email@example.com. Everyone had these numbers, and we all got used to them.
Papers and tests might have a place to put your name, but they always had a place to put your GT Number. We weren’t
names, we were numbers… we were simply
$student++. I’ve never been one for pseudonyms, maybe because I didn’t have
any real issues with my name. Up until this point, I had always used variations of my name for accounts: wnorris,
wjnorris, or wjn730 if nothing else was available. It was only when I no longer had that freedom to identify myself
how I chose that I became aware of how important it was to me.
It wasn’t until my second or third semester that I was eligible to get an account in the College of Computing, which you got to choose yourself. I was quite happy when I could finally give out a decent school email address to people – firstname.lastname@example.org. In a small way, I felt like Equality 7-2521 asserting his individuality, taking the name Prometheus.
When I began to realize the benefit of a personal homepage, I found that the domain willnorris.com was already registered, so I settled on wirewater.org instead. I thought it sounded cool and I liked the definition in the Jargon File. I used that as my personal homepage as well as my main email address for several years, until I was able to buy willnorris.com a few years later and switch everything over to that. I had used wirewater.org so much during those years that I decided to just keep it indefinitely. I don’t think I ever receive legitimate email on that account anymore, but it costs so little that I don’t really worry about it. There is a competitive market for registering “.org” domains, so I can be assured that the price will always remain at a reasonable rate. If I want to change my registrar for whatever reason, I can easily do so.
A(nother) New Identity
In 2007, a new service called FreeYourID was launched by GNR and Janrain. For $11 a year, you could get a third-level .name domain of the form firstname.lastname.name. They would also forward email sent to email@example.com, and later added a few other identity related services like XFN links and redirects to your social network profiles. The most exciting part of all this was that every FreeYourID domain was automatically an OpenID, backed by MyOpenID. It was a great example of putting individuals in control of their identity online, and how OpenID delegation fit into that picture. Seeing the potential for this, I grabbed will.norris.name on the very first day. It wasn’t long before I started using this new URL as my primary identifier online. I still had willnorris.com and continued to use it as a blog, but will.norris.name became my “identity site”. It was a simple landing page that had contact information and links to my profiles on various services. Later I added an activity stream, and XFN links to friends and colleagues. More importantly though, I used it as my primary OpenID on any services that supported it.
About a year and half (and hundreds of OpenID logins) later, I decided that I didn’t want to maintain two sites. I polled my friends, and decided to migrate away from will.norris.name. It was a very manual process of updating my various online profiles, and presented even more challenges with OpenID. But like my transition from wirewater.org I had done several years earlier, I didn’t worry too much about because the extra domain wasn’t really costing me that much.
That all changed this year when it was announced that FreeYourID was shutting down after just two years of operation, and that all accounts would be transitioned over to Key-Systems GmbH. Never mind the fact that the new site to manage your registration is absolutely terrible, the cost for renewal was also raised to 23.39 € (about $35). And unlike my previous .org registration, hours of searching and phone calls have not revealed any way to transfer a third-level .name to a different registrar (in fact, most registrars won’t even transfer second-level .name domains). My domain was scheduled to expire in a few weeks, and I would have liked to just let it go so I don’t have to spend the $35, but there’s a little problem…
OpenID and Reusable Identifiers
I started the process of updating my OpenID on sites a year ago, but I’ve still identified three relying parties that do not support changing your OpenID (at least not that I can find): Disqus, Clickpass, and Pibb. I’m certain there are many more, but these are the only ones that I know I have accounts with, and are currently set to use will.norris.name. So if I let my domain expire, and someone else buys it, they can immediately login to my account at these three services. This is the way OpenID is designed to work… whoever controls the domain is able to authenticate as that URL. So what does this mean for me? Quite simply, it means that if I want to make sure that no one else is able to access my account on any of these three services, I’m forced to pay $35 to renew a domain I don’t use and don’t want.
Who’s to blame for this? Well, I could blame Key-Systems for tripling the price of .name accounts when they took over the FreeYourId service. I could blame myself for having bought the domain in the first place, instead of just sticking with the .com I already had. I could blame the services listed above for not supporting OpenID changes on accounts. And I could blame the OpenID protocol itself for keying on reusable identifiers, instead of using those as aliases to unique, non-reusable identifiers like XRI has been architected to do from the very beginning. All of these would be fair parties to place the blame on, but this post isn’t about placing blame. Instead, this post is about getting the technologists developing and deploying this stuff to start thinking through the entire account lifecycle.
We’re living in a world where the identifiers we use to refer to people online are more important than ever. From IRC nicks to email addresses to Twitter handles. These monikers are typically all that identifies us within a particular service context, and sometimes between contexts. This is particularly true of Twitter handles, which in recent years have come to be seen by some as the de facto namespace for people. I was more than a little upset when my former employer (a company focused on OpenID, no less) linked to my Twitter profile instead of my personal homepage when they announced my hiring. And again this year at WordCamp Portland, it was disheartening to discover that the attendee name badges had a place for your Twitter handle, but not for your blog URL. At a WordCamp! The emphasis on our identifiers on these services makes it increasingly difficult to change your identifier without breaking things. But the fact is, identifiers do change. As our online and offline worlds collide, more and more people are moving away from pseudonyms toward using real identities online (something Facebook had the forethought to require from the very beginning). While this is of course a personal decision, it’s one that Chris Messina recently undertook. Similarly, Tom Coates and Ben Metcalfe, two individuals who understand online identity and social media very well, have considered doing the same.
I guess my point is just this. Identity is important. And identifiers change. So we need to be ready for that as we continue to build the “social web”.
Comments and responses
I find it curious with the various systems of naming user@system system.com/user etc. that twitter has shown a single word can be enough space to provide names for the planet. 6 chars with a-z are 308 million names, 8 chars are 208 billion names.
i am glad to have a vanity domain for myself and with openid delegation i know the identifier will outlast any one provider. at the same time, it appears the email address has beaten the URL as identifier (Facebook, Digg, etc). OpenID's adoption of EAUT will be important.
I hate to say "I told you so", but I blogged about FreeYourID just a day after you did, though much less favorably.
My old blog is now gone along with the domain name (oh the irony!), but thanks to the Wayback Machine, the post (complete with some witty comments from GNR and JanRain) is still here:
Identity IS important. Don't entrust it with the wrong people.
Wow, that was fast! :)
I wasn't the only one, so I hardly deserve the credit. Too bad Krishnan's blog is dead.
P.S. I love the current OpenID plugin UI!
Great article Will. In the early days of OpenID I preached long and hard about the reassignable identifier problem (which the OpenID community generally calls the recyclable identifier problem). But folks were not too worried about it -- the general attitude was, "We'll solve it when we get there."
As your article describes, if you wait until you get there, it's too late ;-)
Here's hoping the next generation of OpenID (the rumored OpenID v.next) gets non-recyclable identifier right.
Great post on how ownership of a name/identity can change, either through a conscious effort (ie. William to Will) or a situation out of your control (FreeYourId being sold, and the new company not providing the service you want --either for the price or services offered).
I think that approach to identity should be the, "Google Commodity Server" approach. Where it is known that Google uses commodity servers in production, which are expected to fail. So processes have been put into place to deal with something that is "expected" to happen, a failure in something, anything.
In a way all public-facing identifiers should be expected to recycle, or "go away," in identifying a particular person or thing. It's sad to say but even http://[www.]facebook.com/nika.jones (which should be me, but I didn't act quick enough smile) will go away someday. It may take 60 years or so, but there is a day when it will need to eventually hit the recycle bin.
My comments are quite long, therefore they have taken a form of a blog post: